Draft
Traditional Chinese Medicine Educational Standards
Raymond
Khoury April 1999
The
draft Australian Guidelines for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)
Education have been released by the National Academic Standards Committee
for Traditional Chinese Medicine (the Committee).
The
Committee's composition is made of the following professional associations
and educational institutions:
Academy
of Natural Therapies, Gold Coast Institute of TAFE
Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Australia
Acupuncture
Association of South Australia
Acupuncture
Association of Victoria
Acupuncture
College of Melbourne
Acupuncture
Ethics and Standards Organisation
Aust-China
Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine Association
Aust-China
Alumni Association of TCM
Australian
Institute of Applied Sciences
Australian Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine Association
Australian College of Acupuncturists
Australian College of Natural Medicine
Australian Natural Therapists Association
Australian Nurses Acupuncture Association
Australian Traditional Chinese Medicine Association
Australian Traditional-Medicine Society
College of Traditional Medicine
Hepburn's College of Natural Medicine
International Acupuncture Association
Melbourne College of Natural Medicine
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
South Australian College of Natural and Traditional Medicine
Southern Cross University
Sydney Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine
The Register of Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine
The University of Sydney
Traditional Medicine of China Society Australia
University of Technology, Sydney
University of Western Sydney, Macarthur
Victoria University of Technology
The
draft Guidelines outline the broad principles and minimum requirements
for Australian primary qualifying courses in TCM. The need for the
Guidelines arose from a number of factors:
a)
the proliferation of courses in TCM with varying duration, standards
and qualification levels
b)
moves towards occupational regulation of TCM practitioners by Victoria
c)
the need to reach national agreement on the principles and standards
for TCM education prior to registration of TCM practitioners
d)
the desire for State accrediting authorities and universities to have
nationally consistent standards.
The
Guidelines are not intended to be a curriculum document for courses
or as competency standards for TCM. The Guidelines outlines the standards
for future courses, as existing practitioners will be dealt with under
graduate and transitional arrangements. It will be the responsibility
of course providers to develop their course philosophy and rationale,
course aims and objectives, course structure, sequencing of learning
outcomes etc and to demonstrate how these meet the goal of TCM education.
The
brief Guidelines recommend that acupuncturists and Chinese herbalists
be taught at a bachelors degree level in a program of study delivered
in face-to-face mode and conducted by or closely audited by a degree-granting
educational institution. For a student undertaking a program in either
acupuncture or Chinese herbal medicine, the nominal duration of the
program is four academic years (eight semesters) and approximately
2,500 hours.
For
a student undertaking a double modality course ie acupuncture and
Chinese herbal medicine, the recommended nominal duration is between
four and five academic years (eight to ten semesters) and approximately
3,300 hours.
The
Guidelines recommend that the essential components of the qualifying
course are:
a)
study of at least either acupuncture-moxibustion or Chinese herbal
medicine, or both, which will include the principles and philosophy
of the modality, an exploration of its place in health care, a study
of its limitations and when referral to other forms of treatment is
required
b)
a component of clinical education and supervised clinical practice
c)
study of biomedical sciences at a standard comparable with a bachelor's
degree leading to professional practice in other primary health care
and to the level required to ensure safe and competent practice
d)
a component in areas related to professional ethics, practitioner/patient
relations etc.
The
Guidelines recommend that 30-35% be allocated to TCM principles and
philosophy, 25-35% to practical studies and clinical practicum, 25-35%
to biomedical sciences and 7.5-10% to ethics and professional issues.